Subject: Re: Command 0xNN completed with result code 0xNN workaround?
To: Gunnar Helliesen <gunnar@bitcon.no>
From: David Brownlee <abs@anim.dreamworks.com>
List: port-vax
Date: 01/27/1998 17:27:17
Note: your 'rename each broken file into a directory which is
nevr used' would work fine, but wastes more disk space :)
David/absolute
< You can't buy love - though I've seen it rented occasionally >
On Tue, 27 Jan 1998, David Brownlee wrote:
> You should delete each file, use 'badsect' (check the man page),
> run fask, then unpack the files again.
>
> If you have inode data on badsectors then it gets very painful...
> (I think you can newfs the disk with different parameters but
> just hope you do not have to go there :)
>
> David/absolute
>
> - "It was at that point I realised there might be a chance for myself
> - as a caring human being. Unable to decide whether to feel hopeful or
> - disgusted, I chose both and opened a bottle of wine to celebrate."
>
> On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, Gunnar Helliesen wrote:
>
> > As I'm unpacking the binaries on my "new" RD53 I'm seeing more of the
> > dreaded "Command 0xNN completed with result code 0xNN" messages.
> >
> > I'm keeping track of the files affected, could a workaround be to rename
> > them, thus keeping the bad blocks allocated, and then reinstalling them?
> >
> > Gunnar
> >
> > --
> > Gunnar Helliesen | Bergen IT Consult AS | NetBSD/VAX on a uVAX II
> > Systems Consultant | Bergen, Norway | '86 Jaguar Sovereign 4.2
> > gunnar@bitcon.no | http://www.bitcon.no/ | '73 Mercedes 280 (240D)
> >
> >
>
>
>