> > The 'errors' you saw aren't errors at all, and are perfectly normal.
> > Notice that fsck is run with -n, so that it doesn't try to 'correct'
> > them...
> 
>   These pseudo-errors are files that are currently open for writing,
> I assume?

That could be the case.  They could also be files which are still
open, but are deleted from the file system namespace.  I dunno what
other cases are possible, but there might be some.


cgd