Subject: Re: sun3 port different then many others
To: Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. <bsd@hawkmountain.net>
From: Jeremy Cooper <jeremy@baymoo.org>
List: port-sun3
Date: 06/03/2003 01:13:32
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote:
>
> Does this mean that the sun2 port is more up to date ? (it seems to
> have that structure rather than the one the sun3 port has)
Strangely enough, yes. The Sun2 port was completed much more recently.
> Also, of interest I see it builds with -msoft_float ... shouldn't it
> have -m68881 ?
Generally we have kept to the rule that the kernel should not contain any
floating point code. I doubt you would see a difference if you changed
these options.
> What would be involved in bringing the sun3 port up to speed with the
> way the rest of the ports work ? (I'm guessin it would be a quite a bit
> of work) Is there any docs on the old structure vs the new structure ?
It is hard to say how much work is involved. If it just involves porting
the bus-DMA framework, I would say "not very much". I was going to do the
work in 2000, but I got sidetracked and haven't done much since.
For starters, you can try reading up on the framework. It's in section 9
of the manual. bus_space(9) and bus_dma(9).
-J