Subject: Re: sun3 versus netbsd-1.3 kernel sizes
To: None <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Gordon W. Ross <gwr@mc.com>
List: port-sun3
Date: 02/20/1998 10:21:23
> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 08:55:12 -0500 (EST)
> From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
[...]
> Why does the kernel have to be loaded entirely below the hole? Even if
> it has to be physically contiguous, every -3/50 has at least three megs
> above the hole, no?
Technically, you could build a kernel with a funny link map that
puts blank space where the BW frame buffer is, but as a practical
matter, poor old 3/50 boxes don't want such a big kernel anyway.
Another easier way to deal with this is use LKMs, because after
the kernel is booted, the VM knows how to avoid the video.
Given those points, I'm not motivated to make it possible to
boot (initial) kernel images larger than 1MB on the 3/50.