Subject: Re: mbuf weirdness...
To: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@lagavulin.pdl.cs.cmu.edu>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@SJ.Xenotropic.COM>
List: port-sun3
Date: 03/27/1995 22:17:53
On Tue, 28 Mar 1995 01:00:17 -0500
Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@LAGAVULIN.PDL.CS.CMU.EDU> wrote:
> the problem is the the boot RPC code expects that the RPC reply
> message can fit entirely in one mbuf. This is a bogus assumption, and
> i think it's XXX'd in the code.
That it is...
> A possible workaround: make the root/swap pathnames shorter.
Well, I'll be able to do that in a week or two (disk layout...) Until
then, I guess I'll have to use bigger mbufs..*sigh*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@Xenotropic.COM