Re: spdmem matching (Was: envstat drivers on SUN Ultra-45?)

[Julian Coleman <jdc%coris.org.uk@localhost>]

Hi,

> > I think I added it because my Tadpole Viper has it as the only entry in
> > 'compatible', and IIRC the name matching didn't find it for some
> > reason. It's been years ago though, memory is fuzzy :/
> > Since it's causing confusion I have no objection to removing it.
> 
> I wonder if we could remove it from spdmem_i2c and instead add a patch
> for the Viper

Having experimented with patching OFW on the U45, I don't think that we
should change the existing spdmem_i2c match.  I'm not sure exactly what
this chip is on the U45, but I think that patching there to get a better
match makes more sense.

Regards,

Julian

--