Re: bswap is slow on SPARC

[Sad Clouds <cryintothebluesky%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 04:27:00 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:

> Code implementing cryptographic primitives is fairly costly, to
> verify, test, audit, and maintain it: if you make a mistake --
> especially in a context where there's no opportunity for a noisy
> failure to interoperate -- it could just silently destroy any
> security.  That's why it's important to keep the number of primitives
> low, and risky to adopt nonstandard variants like a big-endian version
> of standard primitives.

OK that makes sense. I think OpenSSL seem to have a number of optimised
variants of AES for SPARC:

src/crypto/external/bsd/openssl/lib/libcrypto/arch/sparc64/aesfx-sparcv9.S
src/crypto/external/bsd/openssl/lib/libcrypto/arch/sparc64/aes-sparcv9.S
src/crypto/external/bsd/openssl/lib/libcrypto/arch/sparc64/aest4-sparcv9.S

although I'm not sure how viable it would be to port some of those to
say src/sys/crypto/aes/arch/sparc64 for example. Are these completely
different and incompatible designs?