Re: UltraSPARC III/IIe cpufreq drivers, please test

[BERTRAND Joël <joel.bertrand%systella.fr@localhost>]

Martin Husemann a écrit :
> Ugh, the cpufreq(9) interface is very ugly.
>
> Stupid question: instead of adding a psycho (or shizo) softc to cpuinfo_t,
> why don't you just use the proper softc as cf_cookie in struct cpufreq?

	I think it could work for UltraSPARC-IIe, but not for UltraSPARC-III as 
frequency has to be independently set for each couple schizo/cpu. To 
modify energy_star register (in schizo), I have to access to energy_star 
register associated to the corresponding CPU.

	In another hand, I don't understand why cpufreq interface is registered 
once for the system and not by CPU. If it was registered by cpu, it will 
be easier to use cf_cookie.

        Regards,

        JKB