Port-sparc64 archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Status of SMP on sbus machines?
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 12:23 +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
> From: Chris Ross <cross+netbsd%distal.com@localhost>
> > Still more information. I did eventually get perl to build.
> > Actually, after the configure phase, it got much better. And, I once
> > got it to complete configure without more than one or two crashes like
> > the above.
> >
> > So, this morning, I tried a "make test" on the built perl. While
> > perl is running, *it* sometimes will throw this sort of error. I got:
> >
> > Oct 20 09:37:32 usparc /netbsd: trap: textfault at 41502fc0!! sending
> > SIGILL due to trap 16: illegal instruction
> > Oct 20 09:39:42 usparc /netbsd: trap: textfault at 41a02fc0!! sending
> > SIGILL due to trap 16: illegal instruction
> > Oct 20 09:39:44 usparc /netbsd: trap: textfault at 41a02fc0!! sending
> > SIGILL due to trap 16: illegal instruction
> > Oct 20 09:39:45 usparc /netbsd: trap: textfault at 41502fc0!! sending
> > SIGILL due to trap 16: illegal instruction
> >
>
> Does this happen if you try a non SMP kernel? (Just curious)
Excellent thought. As it turns out, if I boot a 4.99.73 GENERIC
rather than the GENERIC.MP I'd been running on, the same tests fail
running the same previously-built perl binary in pkgsrc/lang/perl5.
So, a sparc64 problem that's not SMP related. Perhaps there's
improper support for UltraSPARC I processors?
Any suggestions as to what I could/should do to help track down a fix?
- Chris
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index