Re: sparc[64] smp

[Takeshi Nakayama <tn%catvmics.ne.jp@localhost>]

>>> Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote

> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:20:39AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> > won't this break pcons?
> 
> Probably - someone(tm) should test, and if this broke it, do some better fix
> (like a callout local to pcons).

I think this removal don't change as before.

The user of "softintr" (and "struct intrhand soft01intr") were:

1) void setsoftint()
2) struct intrhand *intrhand[16]

1) was disabled with "#if 0".
2) had never been used in sparc64 interrupt code.
   we use interrupt vector "intrlev" and pending list "intrpending".

-- Takeshi Nakayama