Subject: Re: x configuring...
To: None <port-sparc64@NetBSD.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: port-sparc64
Date: 09/27/2005 05:13:34
> one more question, just for clarification:
> is the term "multihead" more a generic term to any box having 2 or
> more monitors connected, regardless of how these are used and what
> they display (e.g. also mirroring the same image, why not siply with
> a Y-video-cable)?
It's a bit fuzzy, as I understand it. To me, multihead refers,
etymologically speaking, to multiple monitors, but using it for two
monitors that always display the same thing (whether done with tricks
such as a splitter video cable or whether done by having two video
driver circuits) strikes me as stretching the term; I prefer to reserve
it for two separate video displays. (I'm careful to avoid saying two
video cards, since it seems perfectly correct to call a machine with
two framebuffers on one physical card multiheaded.)
> or is it specific to a box where only one user (with all input
> devices such as keyboard(s), mouse... "belong to him") but the
> "desktop" spans all connected screens (either having available
> :0.0,:0.1,:0.2... or using xinerama or the like) and windows
> scattered all over?
To me, it's just multiple displays. Whether they correspond to
independent sessions or not relevant to multiheadedness.
> is there a "correct[TM]" terminology for differentiating all the use
> cases in this area?
Perhaps, but if it's not as sketched above, I don't know it! :)
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B