Subject: Re: Ati Rage IIc: could not be detected?
To: Florian Stoehr <netbsd@wolfnode.de>
From: Michael <macallan18@earthlink.net>
List: port-sparc64
Date: 07/30/2005 10:58:38
--Signature_Sat__30_Jul_2005_10_58_38_-0400_mZu1U1VzJ2/06aer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

> Argh. I'll give xorg a try first,=20

Probably worth a try.

> then I'll grab some Rage Pro card.

Wait a second. There's one thing I didn't try yet. Your XFree86.0.log is
full of messages like this:=20
(II) PCI Memory resource overlap reduced 0x00004000 from 0x00007fff to=20
0x00005fff
- I don't see a single one of them. When XFree messes with PCI BARs
machfb won't notice and probably mmap wrong address ranges. I'll mail
you a patch for machfb to test this.

> Until I got the Pro, perhaps having a look at ATIMach64Probe() might
> help  if I at least add some debug print output to see where exactly
> it fails...

This would indeed help a lot - I can't do anything here. I had a look at
the code, it sure looks funky but without being able to reproduce the
problem that's rather pointless.

have fun
Michael

--Signature_Sat__30_Jul_2005_10_58_38_-0400_mZu1U1VzJ2/06aer
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQuuVospnzkX8Yg2nAQKCmAf+Nb2/gBP/Dg/KNA5/Mir52I/uEdQ2Y0v5
UD6peKqTpAyCzNG4opiFcEdDsDqjEOqsbeMIhiPvv7MZioLpc2KKJtOMoQ/7ZUEG
k9wCF/UEAW+/c2uUpYRqWYLAlAxahH+1R5Uc8c0VbOn68LufMJKzIqgOrDTtfbt7
7g661mSY79nORV28B8THmnjC2e19qgLTCQ2z/r2dAZhn9Lp6nHf4/xG8FScR30CZ
I0EDgfNkxPzD1bEt2qOGCOKXD3CKSu5GwfdoYQmCnret+atyy3M8zMqjCwkQGdO+
3ZACfKEPVlOkFDeiG9gSHYJDhKrKYzkBfoFEyIFx3gl04JL78PLMNw==
=96r4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature_Sat__30_Jul_2005_10_58_38_-0400_mZu1U1VzJ2/06aer--