--Signature_Tue__14_Jun_2005_12_15_15_-0400_b/lF+JsK7z+CVuYf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

> I was thinking more of a bad interaction between the Simba and the
> onboard bridge on the qfe (a problem that is perhaps not evident with
> cards without an onboard bridge). I also have an esiop(4) that gives
> more than 200K/s in my Ultra 5 :)

Ah, so I got you wrong. I don't have any PCI card with a bridge on it so
I can't try that.  Joel - can you try the card in another box?=20

> Joel - what performance do you get from the onboard hme(4)? I upgraded
> my Ultra 5 to 3.0_BETA last night and got at least 1.5M/s from the
> onboard hme(4) during the upgrade installation. I'm pretty certain I
> got similar performance with 2.0 and 2.0.2.

Hmm, I got ~5MB/s from mine, then the AIX box on the other end maxed out
( no duplex for some weird reason ). The hme would still do a bit more
I'm sure. ( after all a mere Netra X1 ( USIIe, only 256kB cache ) can
move ~9MB/s on each of its onboard NICs without breaking into sweat,
but that was Solaris 8 )


--Signature_Tue__14_Jun_2005_12_15_15_-0400_b/lF+JsK7z+CVuYf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQq8Ck8pnzkX8Yg2nAQLumwf9Ft16T68c/Qyu51nDeqPPGR6f4vaZlkRl
Gaa1nmFNQ2pE7Wq9liwfZj5rzvP/shOMiVo9Q1cLNFkEh3ESvKBJ/CtEG/0gefYg
ru4zJ7NZvpzlY9CehndG5jLiSDnPnyzO40VpBk1svrr1NgNLIrsHH2FZoWFQFJF3
JA4cqgsGGAxs9a24dLFsY9sG6OFGrCCc31lta38c3U1YDSJ7HHMpeKfRziBnTpF+
LKlLiB5mWtGHOxW7DuB/glE+Dzdmm8ONvjpJnYsos/BEjxS1Q2KJakr1BKcRaa+P
mn+0OFjZrqai/ZUUKdwK0QyW/oJ3k9oZyv3jRInJx6rsythUnTsTWA==
=E6bT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature_Tue__14_Jun_2005_12_15_15_-0400_b/lF+JsK7z+CVuYf--