--Signature=_Sat__12_Mar_2005_14_12_43_-0500_rAQ5im6kKizdTUvJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,

> BTW: You will also get invalid HP-PA code when using -Ox where x != 0
> on a 32 bit machine, but this is relatively rare. (But sometimes verry
> anoying to debug if happens.)
> 
> I can understand your "I have found no reason not to run the machines
> 64-bit." I would run the machines 64 bit fore sure if there wheren't
> those anoying HP-PA tool chain problems.

Umm, stupid questions - what do apparently HPPA-specific bugs in gcc to do with sparc64? I've yet to encounter internal compiler errors or screwed binaries and I use an U10 running 64bit userland as my main workhorse ( look at the x-mailer header of this mail... ). In fact I have more weird problems with sparc32 than with sparc64, but that may be SPARCbook-related.

have fun
Michael

--Signature=_Sat__12_Mar_2005_14_12_43_-0500_rAQ5im6kKizdTUvJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQjM/K8pnzkX8Yg2nAQLLbAf/VkuqnjRi+MnwWjC8QV/O791n2lSyj8j8
Cwmsu63K17ld0VvWu7LHI13oo+0jTzb/P1DrXH2c0No0joS8MUlWBOAmJCfY0yfg
oKEB7j3N2s3CymOthM4wYqj4ewCpu0KbCvGQBh/dZN3F6JRIliqGs+ewMgx6sJ2P
2wM6uHNmI7AqSFgesPkq+bzFfIHeB5l83Y1RhzBsLngxMTv4HF5pMI6OUXBa1cGT
BHKAJILfpwgaLI2sRQrKjWFY/iJWSbz8IdYoZN40RSOX082acvhWIakWyB5rUrR6
6fRbAY6YdcOEL473SlbgpzQ/IrC4+7Cv3dihyq8N8nAeuCiQT6Ct2w==
=hTuH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sat__12_Mar_2005_14_12_43_-0500_rAQ5im6kKizdTUvJ--