On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:27:04PM -0400, Sean Davis wrote:
> that is possible, I suppose, but if the bug was introduced with newer
> IPF (as seems to be implied...), why hasn't <whatever change was made
> to the ftp code> been reverted? It seems to me that nobody is very

It would mean reverting to ipf 3.x, which would then bring us back all
the issues which were fixed in ipf4.

> interested in fixing this, as (I guess) sparc/sparc64 isn't a popular
> enough NAT platform for this to be biting more than a few people.

I live with it, but I'm mostly using IPv6 these days ...

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--