On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 10:08:56AM +0900, Takeshi Nakayama wrote:

> Our interrupt handler pending list has issue that it has
> possibilities to link same handler twice, since we use same value
> 0 to indicate the list end and a interrupt handler in-use flag.

I don't think this should be an issue since hardware should
only be able to generate an interrupt once and the interrupt
must be handled and acknowledged (hence unlinked) before it
can be re-issued.  Or am I missing something here?

Eduardo