--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:57:14AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
>   =20
>      - Blade 100 and 150
>=20
> does sb150 support actually work?  ISTR multiple people not being
> able to run netbsd on it?
>    Will 2.0 have support for USB-based console?  What level of X support=
=20
>    will there be for PCI and SBUS systems?
>=20

I've never been able to run either 1.6.2 nor 1.6ZK on sb150. There were
problems with usb, pciide and atapi buses. I'll try using a serial
console but i don't expect it to work much better...

Concerning X on SBus systems, I'm able to run Xsun quite well on my
Ultra1 (that was some months ago since it's used as a screenless server).

> 2.0 will support X on the cgsix@sbus and i think ffb@mainbus (but i
> could be wrong here.)  there is no PCI VGA support yet AFAIK.
>   =20

Yes, Ultra1 has cgsix@sbus.

>    Am I missing anything?  Did I include anything that won't be working=
=20
>    with 2.0?  Below is a list of models Sun has shipped that I haven't=20
>    seen mentioned as being supported or tested.
>    [ list deleted ]
>=20
> anything UltraSPARC III based isn't supported yet.  that's most of
> your list...but i'm not sure about all of them.
>=20
>=20
> .mrg.

--=20
Richard Braun

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAsYF4BlWsEPLYRi8RAtPVAKCqTXcylkpUbWiYXkJKl4ZbrnHjhgCbBF1A
uwkjq1nkhFbCDPBnuNM5M68=
=wSu1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--