On 24/02/2004, at 6:34 PM, Martin Husemann wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:24:34PM +1100, James Whitwell wrote:
>> Does that mean the machine won't boot up beyond spinning up the second
>> CPU?
>
> No. It should boot, but besides spinning it up not use the second CPU
> at all.
>
> Could you please try a -current GENERIC kernel on that machine? Maybe 
> something
> else broke.

Sorry, I'd love to oblige, but I've lost access to that machine.

;) jimmy.