Re: Building packages - qemu vs. CC etc.

To: port-sparc%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Building packages - qemu vs. CC etc.
From: Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 20:03:04 -0400 (EDT)

> (Possible dumb question - any advantage to CCâ??ing on a sparc64 (v240 / 4G $

"Maybe."  Yes, sparc64 and sparc are closely related; most (all?)
sparc64 hardware can run sparc32 userland binaries just fine, provided
the kernel is prepared to support it, which I think NetBSD/sparc64 is
if your kernel includes sparc32 compat - or at least it's supposed to
be; I can't recall trying it myself.

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

References:
- Building packages - qemu vs. CC etc.
  - From: vom513

Prev by Date: Building packages - qemu vs. CC etc.
Previous by Thread: Building packages - qemu vs. CC etc.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index