Port-sparc archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?

To: Dave McGuire <mcguire%neurotica.com@localhost>, port-sparc%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke%blastwave.org@localhost>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:35:56 -0400

On 3/24/26 17:47, Dave McGuire wrote:

On 3/24/26 17:38, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Why are all the interfaces stuck to the same MAC address? Could that
be due to the local-mac-address value in the PROM ?
I don't recall the details, but I definitely remember having to"setenv local-mac-address? true" in OBP using hme boards to get per-interface MAC addresses.


yup .. I have that.  No change.



--
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken

References:
- Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
  - From: Ben Kallus
- Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
  - From: Dennis Clarke
- Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
  - From: Erik LaBine
- Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
  - From: Dennis Clarke
- Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
  - From: Dave McGuire

Prev by Date: Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
Next by Date: Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
Previous by Thread: Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
Next by Thread: Duplicated MACs [was Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?]
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index