Port-sparc archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?

To: port-sparc%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
From: "erik%eriklabine.com@localhost erik%eriklabine.com@localhost" <erik%eriklabine.com@localhost>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:24:15 -0500 (EST)

> On 23-03-2026 11:06 AM EDT Dave McGuire <mcguire%neurotica.com@localhost> wrote:
> 
>    I have to wonder what the point of this would be.  The SS20, like all 
> SPARCstations, has an integrated network interface.  What's the use case 
> here?

The BlueSCSI can do WiFi, and expose that as a SCSI ethernet device.

Maybe a bit niche, but I could see the usefulness.

Erik

References:
- Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
  - From: Ben Kallus
- Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
  - From: Dave McGuire

Prev by Date: Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
Next by Date: Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
Previous by Thread: Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
Next by Thread: Re: Include DaynaPort by default in GENERIC?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index