Subject: Re: "Bad pAUX_base" again
To: Bruce O'Neel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael <email@example.com>
Date: 10/07/2005 06:47:53
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:06:54 +0000
"Bruce O'Neel" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Sorry this isn't a true followup. Back around 5/9 through 9/9 there
> was chatter about Bad pAUX_base and which systems this occured on. I
> finally got the time and put a 60mhz SuperSparc in a SS20 and did a
> build.sh run. 3 days later and we don't have any cores nor Bad
> pAUX_base messages in the build log.
> - SparcBook and Krups with basically the same CPUs, yes. (Michael)
I didn't see it lately, even built most of XFree on the Krups. Doesn't
mean anything though, it's never been frequent and for various reasons
I'm always running some pretty recent -current.
> Is it the level 2 cache? (I'm frowning but you can't see that) The
> microsparc IIs don't have it. My hypersparcs do, and so does my
Unlikely, I remember someone with a Classic who didn't have the problem.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----