--Signature_Fri__7_Oct_2005_06_47_53_-0400_iD1lBmgf.Izz7vDf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:06:54 +0000
"Bruce O'Neel" <edoneel@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> Sorry this isn't a true followup.  Back around 5/9 through 9/9 there
> was chatter about Bad pAUX_base and which systems this occured on.  I
> finally got the time and put a 60mhz SuperSparc in a SS20 and did a
> build.sh run.  3 days later and we don't have any cores nor Bad
> pAUX_base messages in the build log.

> - SparcBook and Krups with basically the same CPUs, yes. (Michael)

I didn't see it lately, even built most of XFree on the Krups. Doesn't
mean anything though, it's never been frequent and for various reasons
I'm always running some pretty recent -current.

> Is it the level 2 cache? (I'm frowning but you can't see that) The
> microsparc IIs don't have it.  My hypersparcs do, and so does my
> supersparc.

Unlikely, I remember someone with a Classic who didn't have the problem.

have fun
Michael

--Signature_Fri__7_Oct_2005_06_47_53_-0400_iD1lBmgf.Izz7vDf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQ0ZSWcpnzkX8Yg2nAQIwgggAhvzKDXKy/iokV8CHeaGri+JcvK3Jp5ee
QU2UKqg1C+wYXdasau1fjOgN+1/QEKLPVoQ7SR2YnDrq4XWx8hOZE7QN7DcfjWPM
+plvdfEhF+kJS+tB2DcjkuC8cIqrt+4SDMtHGabCEhBwHx/gLScLXJEnCzsE7nRF
EGaN/vG2HoS+cxGzOwEUTgnhPGpFfoLZizfLeNn96MB6F3F9vbohVWGSxd1mLji1
v4m3O+OekfOtNKvKIRldQ4W0x13mw7zkBZbW136LSy7ESUDxdpGOYBAd92PyVYRr
d1kpYLlMK0jRBI+LMRF9cl6kG1MqAh2emLpIOFbBj8SQQj2gFaMqKA==
=eTq4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature_Fri__7_Oct_2005_06_47_53_-0400_iD1lBmgf.Izz7vDf--