Subject: Re: "Bad pAUX_base" again
To: Laurent FAILLIE <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Bruce O'Neel <email@example.com>
Date: 09/05/2005 14:24:01
I have both a SS4/110mhz, ie, a microsparc II, and a SS20 with
a collection of different hypersparc processors.
On the SS4 I get the Bad pAUX_base complaint when starting a program
somewhat often. On the cron job that I run every 10 minutes I'll get
the complaint a dozen or so times a day.
The other problem, though it might be the same, is that /bin/sh
cores pretty often.
Take the hard disk out of the SS4 and drop it in the SS20 and the
problem goes away. The SS20 is rock solid, the ss4 was never quite so
My conclusion from the above would be that there is something
ever so slightly special about the Microsparc II which NetBSD
is not quite getting right. No I don't have an idea beyond that.
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:26:36AM +0200, Laurent FAILLIE wrote:
> I saw some thread related to "Bad pAUX_base" messages
> in this mailing list but I haven't found a conclusion.
> So, what is the current status on this issue ? Is
> there any patch to solve it or at least a workaround ?
> I'm running a SS5 @110Mhz and I got sometime some 'Bad
> pAUX_base' when compiling pkgsrc, or during login
> phase w/ telnet or ftp :-(
> I'm running also named9 which crashing twice a day. I
> wandering if it's not the same issue.
> Best regards,
> The misspelling master is on the Web.
> _________ 100 % Dictionnary Free !
> / /(
> / Dico / / Pleins d'autres fautes sur
> /________/ / http://go.to/destroyedlolo
> (#######( / http://destroyedlolo.homeunix.org:8080
> Quoi, des fautes d'orthographe! Pas possible ;-D.
> Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
> T?l?chargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org