Subject: Re: Performances ?
To: None <port-sparc@netbsd.org>
From: Bernd Sieker <bsieker@freenet.de>
List: port-sparc
Date: 11/28/2003 13:14:43
On 28.11.03, 10:46:31, Laurent FAILLIE wrote:
> --- Bernd Sieker <bsieker@freenet.de> a ?crit?: > On
> 27.11.03, 19:55:42, Laurent FAILLIE wrote:
>
> > Is that a 110MHz model? That's strange,
>
> Yes. But I have some very small processes that
> generate statistics about my web site in background
> (they don't run during my 1st test) Normaly, they
> don't take much time but perhasp they make POV
> swaping. So I will remove them and remake my test.
>
> > I submitted
> > a result to
> > the official benchmark site of a 85MHz SPARCstation
> > 4, and it "only"
> > took 49:39:19. It's currently ranked 206 out of 207
> > on the official
> > site.
> >
> (http://www.haveland.com/index.htm?povbench/index.php).
>
> yes, I saw it :-)
>
> > Btw., rank 207 is also one of my NetBSD machines, a
> > HP 9000/433t,
> > 33MHz Motorola 68040. It took 192:42:08(!).
>
> I though it was an Amiga :-). Do you made some test
> using GCC3 ?
No, not yet ...
>
> > I shall soon also benchmark my Amiga (40MHz 68040).
>
> Which binary you use ? Please note there is a port of
> GCC3 now for AmigaOS (I duno if it can be downloaded
> from Aminet or if it's on GeekGadget). If you want, I
> can ask to the AmigaC mailing where you can got it.
I will probably benchmark it under NetBSD, using the currently
installed -current, which is using gcc3. I'm not doing a lot with
AmigaOS, currently, but I might do it some day in my "copious free
time".
>
> It's cool to have benchmark of such old goodies ;-D
That's what I thought. If you can't be fastest, try to be slowest
;)
>
> Bye
>
> Lolo
>
--
Bernd Sieker
NetBSD - the Berkeley redemption.
-- Julian Assange