Subject: Re: Performances ?
To: None <port-sparc@netbsd.org>
From: Bernd Sieker <bsieker@freenet.de>
List: port-sparc
Date: 11/27/2003 21:16:04
On 27.11.03, 19:55:42, Laurent FAILLIE wrote:
>  --- matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> a ?crit : >    
> 
> > there are several options.  for sparc, it depends on
> > the exact
> > cpu.  for the SS5/110, that's a microsparcII cpu...
> > hmm there
> > appears to be no special flags for that, just -mv8. 
> > for the
> > ultra5, try "-mcpu=ultrasparc -mtune=ultrasparc" 
> 
> 
> Arg, my SS5 just finished : GCC 2.95.3 as previously
> but w/ -mv8 -> 45h18 :-(((( It's worst :-(
> I will try now using GCC3

Is that a 110MHz model? That's strange, I submitted a result to
the official benchmark site of a 85MHz SPARCstation 4, and it "only"
took 49:39:19. It's currently ranked 206 out of 207 on the official
site. (http://www.haveland.com/index.htm?povbench/index.php).

Btw., rank 207 is also one of my NetBSD machines, a HP 9000/433t,
33MHz Motorola 68040. It took 192:42:08(!).

I shall soon also benchmark my Amiga (40MHz 68040). I will refrain from
benchmarking the IBM z50 (subnotebook running NetBSD/hpcmips), which
lacks an FPU and will probably take several thousand hours.

> 
> Bye
> 
> Lolo
> 

-- 
Bernd Sieker

NetBSD: Resistance is NOT futile!
		-- Hubert Feyrer