Subject: Re: BigMac (be0) doesn't work at 100baseTX
To: beaker <email@example.com>
From: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/16/2003 17:32:22
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, beaker wrote:
[b: Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 17:12:06 -0800 (PST)
[b: From: beaker <email@example.com>
[b: To: port-sparc <firstname.lastname@example.org>
[b: Subject: Re: BigMac (be0) doesn't work at 100baseTX
[b: > The BE and HME Sbus 100base-TX network interface cards each have an
[b: > MII connector, and an RJ-45 socket. So far as I know, only one of
[b: > those, per card, may be selected as the interface that packets flow
[b: > over at any given moment.
[b: > Neither of these cards has an AUI connector.
[b: > The BE is half-duplex only.
[b: > The HME can do full duplex.
[b: Um - sorry: I was referring to the network interfaces on the SS-5's system
[b: board: two (2) MII and one (1) TPE. I would assume that since there are
[b: two built-in MII connectors, that two external transceivers could be used
[b: simultaneously, right?
One is an MII, the other is a BPP.
The MII requires a special adapter which happens to convert to AUI :).
You can only use one port on any given interface.
Now, if you have a be and the onboard le, you might be able to multiplex
through them at 10BaseT. Maybe. Some kind soul will no doubt say, "No,
Greywolf is Wrong, don't listen to him," which is fine, but I thought we
supported some sort of multiple-interface multiplexing
NetBSD: unshackling hardware designers and users from the bondage of WinTel.