Subject: Re: smp for ss10
To: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: David Maxwell <email@example.com>
Date: 02/09/2003 23:34:57
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 12:57:57PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 11:20:42AM -0500, David Maxwell wrote:
> > At that point, you'll be on 1.6 userland and -current kernel, so some
> > utils like top and ps may not behave well, but you should be able to get
> > a sense of whether the system boots and runs both CPUs.
> Just a data point, I have been using a very recent -current kernel
> with a 1.5.1_alpha userland and top + ps work fine.
> right. simonb fixed top & ps (process grovellers) to use well-defined,
> forwards-compatible sysctl()'s to get process info. i can even run a
> 32 bit sparc top or ps binary under netbsd32 emulation on a sparc64 box
> and get sane results.
> if this does not work, it's a bug to be fixed.
Excellent. I didn't know he had allowed for multiple cpus too - but
looking at top's commit logs, I see that it was all ready to go.
Of course, you'll still want a -current userland so that you get native
libpthread, and an up to date ps to support that.
P.S. Note that I did say 'may not' ;-)
David Maxwell, firstname.lastname@example.orgemail@example.com -->
If you don't spend energy getting what you want,
You'll have to spend it dealing with what you get.