On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 00:15:16 +1100, Paul NCC/CS wrote:

> Thats the spot where it fails yes. Thanks for having a look
> at it. Have a look in tech-pkg for todays mail. A couple of
> guys have responded to this with some info. And along the
> lines of what you said about gcc etc.
> I have not responded to them yet as I am still mucking about
> with it also. I have made a couple of hacks to the makefile in
> avcalls directory.
> Basically took out the test that fails as I thought uniq may not
> be working correctly with -u switch. It then went on and compiled
> alot more , but then promptly core dumped in the next directory
> that it went to build in.

I don't remember details (it was about an year ago), but it was
something related to how arguments of type struct { int i; }; vs. mere
"int" are passed.  Maybe for a type wider than int, but you get the
idea.

SY, Uwe
-- 
uwe@ptc.spbu.ru                         |       Zu Grunde kommen
http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/            |       Ist zu Grunde gehen