Subject: Re: which would handle nat better
To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
From: Ronald Cotoni <setient@vlaxus.yi.org>
List: port-sparc
Date: 09/02/2002 16:58:19
yes it don't matter for what i am doing besides i am currently using 1.5.2
due to that being the only iso i could find

On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Manuel Bouyer wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:15:11PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > [ On Sunday, September 1, 2002 at 22:07:10 (-0400), Ronald Cotoni wrote: ]
> > > Subject: Re: which would handle nat better
> > >
> > > thanks for you guys input :) i needed that info so i could setup a new
> > > router cause openbsd has issues with stability on a sparc.
> >
> > Speaking of stability, well, NetBSD-16 may have some serious stability
> > problems on the IPC, if I understand correctly -- i.e. if the IPC has
> > the same cache flush problems as the SS-1 and SS-1+ then it'll crash
> > larger programs regularly.  See the recent "1.6 woes (pmap vs. UBC?)"
> > thread.
>
> Yes. However I used one as IPF/NAT router for months without problems.
> The stability problem affects userland program; routing happens all in
> kernel.
>
> --
> Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
> --
>