Subject: Re: which would handle nat better
To: Brian Hechinger <wonko@4amlunch.net>
From: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
List: port-sparc
Date: 09/02/2002 09:16:31
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Brian Hechinger wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 10:54:00PM -0400, Ronald Cotoni wrote:
> > i allready have a nice webserver it is a sun ipx and a p100 i use them for
> > services as well as my alpha i honestly have too many machines but that is
> > ok.
>
> no such thing as too many machines. ;)
>
> ok, then i say use the ipc, but for a different reason.
>
> it's cuter.  ;)

	Just to be different: Use the ss2 and use raidframe to mirror
	two disks for redundancy (disks do not need to the be same size,
	just just mirror a section the same size, and use the rest as
	ordinary scratch partitions)
-- 
		David/absolute          -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --