Subject: Re: which would handle nat better
To: None <port-sparc@netbsd.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: port-sparc
Date: 09/02/2002 09:03:56
> My network is all Alpha. [...] I'm actually considering buying
> machines that aren't Alphas but are still rackmountable just to get
> some variety.
> Does this sound reasonable to anyone?
Sure sounds good to me. But then, I already share your desire for
variety. I've got eight different ports with six different CPU
architectures set up at home (sparc, sun3, i386, alpha, vax, macppc,
mac68k, next68k), though I must admit that most of them are turned off
most of the time. (There are four machines up now, and they are sparc,
sparc, sun3, i386.)
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B