Subject: Re: Rehash: XFree86 Compiled on NetBSD/Sparc
To: NetBSD/sparc Discussion List <port-sparc@netbsd.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: port-sparc
Date: 08/13/2002 23:49:58
> Maybe it makes some sense for sparc64 in order to support a wider
> variety of display cards, but perhaps not for any sbus sparcs where
> all the necessary drivers are already in the kernel where they
> belong.

Indeed?  So what's the kernel-provided API to use the line-drawing
hardware on a cg6?  Or the blitter?

> That's the wacked out part.  As I understand it XFree86 is broken by
> design.  It cannot understand a proper framebuffer device driver and
> thinks it wants direct access to the hardware itself.

When it comes to probing buses, I agree with you.

When it comes to talking to the framebuffer, I disagree with you.  I do
not believe it would be acceptable to pay a syscall price for every
framebuffer operation.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B