Huh. Darnedest thing then. Can you let me also know what targets and how they
negotiated?

Maybe it's just the drives I have being unhappy with tags && > 5MB/s.

It wouldn't be the first time with h/w this old that a reported capability by
the drive is just plain wrong.

-matt


On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Jim Bernard wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:24:37PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Jim Bernard wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 08:46:35AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Kernels built after last December fail on my sun4m. Same hardware runs a
> > > > December 2000 kernel just fine.
> > > > 
> > > > I just reconfirmed with top of tree. Anyone seen/know about this?
> > > 
> > >   FWIW, I have a sun4m (sparc 20) running a kernel built March 10 (1.5ZB).
> > > It has lots of scsi devices attached and has been working fine.
> > 
> > What does the esp0 id itself as? ESP200 or ESP100? What clock rate?
> 
> esp0 at dma0 slot 15 offset 0x800000 level 4: ESP200, 40MHz, SCSI ID 7
> 
> --Jim
>