Subject: Re: SS20 network performance, take 2
To: None <port-sparc@netbsd.org>
From: Tomi Nylund <wizard@finland.invalid>
List: port-sparc
Date: 05/20/2002 22:25:29
Well, I tried the new kernel with nsphy enabled, and be(4), ukphy
removed.
The performance dropped(!) from 2.6 MB/s to 2.27 MB/s. ;(
Here's "systat vm" output halfway through a big transfer:
---
1 user Load 0.11 0.18 0.20 Mon May 20
22:17:59
memory totals (in KB) PAGING SWAPPING
Interrupts
real virtual free in out in out 2712
total
Active 6204 6204 69044 ops 273
lev1
All 24488 24488 404960 pages 5
lev4
lev6
Proc:r d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt forks 2234
lev7
1 2 10 25 2715 1 fkppw 100
clock
fksvm
lev12
0.2% Sy 0.2% Us 0.0% Ni 77.5% In 22.1% Id pwait 100
prof
| | | | | | | | | | | relck
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% rlkok
noram
Namei Sys-cache Proc-cache ndcpy
Calls hits % hits % fltcp
zfod
cow
Discs fd0 sd0 64 fmin
seeks 85 ftarg
xfers 1 itarg
Kbyte 6 43 wired
%busy 1.0 pdfre
---
Also, after removing the be cards from the machine, NOT the drivers
from the kernel, and also after removing the drivers from the kernel,
I've started to see these:
May 20 22:16:10 sik-gw1 /netbsd: stray interrupt ipl 0x7 pc=0xf0007604
npc=0xf0007608 psr=401.40c7<S,PS>
Fascinating, isn't it? ;)
Am I hitting the maximum achievable with this setup, as the interrupts
seem to be pretty heavily loaded?
If you have any patches I could try, I'm all ears. Are those "zero-copy"
patches by Jason R Thorpe appliable to 1.5.3 source tree?
Regards,
Tomi
PS: Please reply to the mailing list, as my e-mail address is obfuscated
to repel spammers.