On Tue, Mar 05 2002 at 23:57:52 +1100, matthew green wrote:
>    
>    the SM81 with 2MB cache on the other hand, is a different story.  but then
>    those aren't useable in a sparc10 anyway. :)
> wouldn't that be SM82?  (i've never heard or seen of them before.)
I think "SM81-2". (the page http://mbus.sunhelp.org/modules/ says so)

I guess SM82 would be the name of a double CPU module but read the text the
two "name game" links on that page link to see how strict Sun's mbus-naming
conventions were ;-)

-- 
Dies ist Thilos Unix Signature! Viel Spass damit.