Subject: re: emulation
To: None <eeh@netbsd.org>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: port-sparc
Date: 06/28/2001 16:04:56
   
   If you're trying to do this under sparc64, you need a -current
   kernel and compat_svr4_32 instead, although /emul/svr4_32 can 
   simply be a symlink to /emul/svr4.


hmm..  seeing compat_svr4 (64 bit) use /usr/lib/sparcv9 paths, can we
actually make comapt_svr4_32 use just /emul/svr4 ?  if the suggested
method is to symlink them, what's the benefit of them being separate?
do we expect people to actually install different versions on purpose?


what do you think?