On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> Hum, can you compile a kernel with '-g', so that we know where it is failing
> exactly, and on which value ?

OK, I'm running a (stripped version of a) kernel with debugging symbols
now, and here's some more data:

panic: kernel fault
#0  mi_switch () at ../../../../kern/kern_synch.c:632
632             cpu_switch(p);
(gdb) bt
#0  mi_switch () at ../../../../kern/kern_synch.c:632
#1  0xf002e264 in tsleep (ident=0x0, priority=4, wmesg=0xf00d2a80 "scheduler", 
    timo=0) at ../../../../kern/kern_synch.c:370
#2  0xf00d2b40 in uvm_scheduler () at ../../../../uvm/uvm_glue.c:436
#3  0xf001fcf8 in main () at ../../../../kern/init_main.c:422

(The kernel was generated after a "make clean"... I have no clue why not
all arguments are shown here ... the gdb is still from 1.3 . Update is
delayed by frequent crashes :|)


> Hum, alpha, i386, and now sparc ports are broken. Would be nice if all had the
> same cause :)

Hum, I'm also running 1.4-current (kernel) on i386 here, and it seems
stable to me (though i'm not compiling much, it's mainly an X terminal).


 - Hubert

-- 
Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@rz.uni-regensburg.de>