> although I've heard that "test /memory" doesn't necessarily uncover
> all the voodoo in the memory.

I don't know about the SS2, but I do know that the SS1+ "test-memory"
command is not very thorough.  I've got a known-broken SIMM that sails
right past the PROM memory tests (though SunOS picks it up pretty
promptly).  I've been considering trying to make NetBSD/sparc do
something sensible with memory errors on at least some machines....

					der Mouse

			       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
		     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B