Subject: Re: Performance
To: Jesper Brondum <jb@ct.se>
From: David Brownlee <abs@anim.dreamworks.com>
List: port-sparc
Date: 09/15/1998 10:31:14
Could you try the same test, but sending to /dev/null - to
see what the numbers are like without disk access speeds.
David/absolute
Neighbours should be one of:
a) Understanding b) Distant c) Deaf
On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Jesper Brondum wrote:
> >Jesper Brondum wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I made a test (in life test) of 3 unix's to a ss1+
> >>
> >> ftp a 12MB file to the ss1+ (with identical disks)
> >>
> >> SunOS 4.1.3 699 kb/s (8 meg ram)
> >> NetBSD 1.3.2 420 kb/s (16 meg ram)
> >> S/Linux RH 5.1 510 kb/s (16 meg ram)
> >>
> >> How is it that the difference is that big ...
> >
> >
> > You seem to have changed the machine configuration (RAM) between
> >tests. Did the 4.1.3 test use a SCSI/Ethernet (FSBE) combo Sbus card?
> >The SS1, 1+, IPC, and SLC have onboard SCSI & Ethernet that share a DMA
> >channel. The ethernet has a higher priority, so when there's high
> >network activity, the disk I/O rate on the onboard SCSI interface drops.
> > There are several other questions that need to be answered... Was the
> >other host system changed? Was the other host idle during all three
> >tests? How about the ethernet segment the transfer occured over? Did
> >you make any router hops? Etc... Etc...
>
> All three systems are identical, exept that the SunOS machine has less mem.
>
> (They share the same HUB ... )
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jesper Brondum, Cognitive AB
> mailto:jb@ct.se
> telefon 046-130976, telefax 046-130975, mobil 0706-277766
>
>