greywolf wrote:

> [...], run-levels or (preferably)
> a configurable equivalent should never be/have been done as sequential
> integers, but rather as bit flags to be passed to rc so it knows which
> to do.

I'd rather see a user configured dependency graph, freely naming levels.

-tih
-- 
Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity.  --Niles Crane, "Frasier"