> - Btw, while I'm asking, if new distribution kernels are re-gen'd, can I beg
>   (pretty please (-: ) that they be built with "options UCONSOLE", so that
>   "xconsole" will work out of the box?  All the other i386 kernel config files
>   seem to use it, and the only way to make "xconsole" work otherwise is to
>   make it setuid root, which not only makes me nervous but makes it possible
>   for other people to grab the console by running it (presumably they'd be
>   rejected by xauth-based mechanisms in the normal non-setuid case).

As far as I am aware, defining UCONSOLE allows anyone to write a
10-line program that will grab the console.

When UCONSOLE is undefined, only root can grab the console.

Do you really want me to open up this security hole? (If we had
something like fbtab I think it would be OK.)