>: 	- is "sh3" a good name?  "i386" is okay then we should be okay :-)
>: 	  "superh"?  "hitachi-sh"?
>"sh" is probably the best, as it matches other things (gcc) and does contain
>SH4, etc. support.

	one thing annoys me is that "sh" is too close (identical) to "/bin/sh".

>To match convention with some prior art (binutils), you may want to consider
>..."sh" and ..."shel", rather than ..."sheb" and ..."shel".

	hmm, actually netbsd adds mipseb/mipsel target to binutils (see
	pkgsrc/cross/COMMON/patches-binutils/patch-mips), so maybe we can
	add sheb to binutils too.

itojun