Subject: Re: Free Indy in Melbourne, AU
To: None <port-sgimips@NetBSD.org>
From: Max Matveev <makc@gmx.co.uk>
List: port-sgimips
Date: 06/09/2005 20:19:25
>>>>> "wileyc" == Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@rezrov.net> writes:

 wileyc> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 06:52:40PM +1000, Max Matveev wrote:
 >> And BTW, Indy is IP22, not IP24 as it's saying in the Port/sgimips.

 wileyc> Wrong.  Thus saith sys/IP22.h from IRIX 5.3:

 wileyc> 	The IP24 cpu board is architecturally the same as the IP22 with the
 wileyc> 	following exceptions:
 wileyc> 	1. Uses an IOC1 chip containing the following parts:
 wileyc> 		INT3      - replaces INT2
 wileyc> 		VTI85CX30 - replaces Z85230
 wileyc> 		VTI8042   - replaces Intel 8242
 wileyc> 	2. Sys_ID register identifies IP24 cpu board and ioc1 presence.
 wileyc> 	3. Other register name and offset changes as noted in this file and
 wileyc> 	sys/hpc3.h.

 wileyc> IRIX is an authoritative source IMO.

When why is ChalS in IP22 class - it's the same board as Indy.

Actually, IP24 and IP26 never have being used for product names, they
were for internal use only. IMO it would be less confusing for
non-developing folk as well as some developers with Irix background to
use the names reported by hinv.

max