On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Christopher SEKIYA wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:32:58AM +0200, Dennis Wecker wrote:
>
>> there is this big cache-problem. i've posted some traces a while ago:
>
> r5k support is, indeed, broken.  Perhaps Rafal's r5k patches fix it.
>
> I'll dig them up tomorrow, make a test kernel, and post it.  Let me know if
> it works for you -- I don't have any r5k gear, and this sort of thing can't
> be written with only remote serial access.

 	Would an r5K Indy be OK or do you need an O2?

 	Where are you based? I'd be happy to buy one on ebay and get it
 	shipped direct to you.

-- 
 		David/absolute       -- www.NetBSD.org: No hype required --