the lack of docs does make it difficult. I too, have one of these machines,
and I'd like nothing better than to see it run NetBSD. Brute force always 
wins, but if you can find a more elegant way...

Joe
battlej@groove.com

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 06:24:03PM -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On July 23, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> > consensus also seemed to be that few enough of these machines existed to
> > justify a porting effort.  You're more likely to see a port to IMPACT
> 
>   This has never been a philosophy of NetBSD.  Witness the PC532,
> Cobalt, Netwinder, and the BeBox ports.
> 
>               -Dave McGuire