On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:01:36PM +0200, Jachym Holecek wrote:
> I think what shige@ means here is that currently pci_attach_hook()
> only calls ibm4xx_setup_pci(), which is already called by pchbattach().
> So, the point is ibm4xx_setup_pci() can be left blank or #defined
> away (unless this really _needs_ to happen twice).

Ah, yes.  That makes sense.

I think there are some files and functions there that are still
too 405GP-centric, and need to be made more machine-independent
or split to a more machine-dependent location with a more generic
framework.

-allen

-- 
                  Use NetBSD!  http://www.NetBSD.org/