Subject: Re: Changing ibm4xx device tree.
To: None <port-powerpc@netbsd.org>
From: Toru Nishimura <locore64@alkyltechnology.com>
List: port-powerpc
Date: 05/08/2006 02:35:30
Simon Burge said;
>> It
>> seems more reasonable to hardwire base addresses to kernel config
>> files (or config fragments, where sharing makes sense) then in the
>> code itself, IMO.
>
> Going the other way, I don't think it makes any sense at all to have to
> specify hardware addresses in the kernel config files for SoCs where
> it's impossible for devices to appear at different addresses. Which
> doesn't help you at all :-/
Seconded. I dislike to introduce "config-syntax-circus", which has tainted
many other ports, into powerpc world. Simple enough, smart, please.
Kernel programmer should be proud of fewer lines of code, not larger.
Toru Nishimura/ALKYL Technology