Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> At least rtc.c will cause some conflicts (inittodr(9) etc.)
> on walnut unless evbppc/walnut/dev/todclock.c is fixed.
> Anyway rtc.c has no "device" specific function, so it should be
> moved to evbppc/evbppc/todclock.c (or something) for now, IMO.
> (eventually these todr(9) functions should be in sys/dev/clock_subr.c)

Perhaps, evbppc/walnut/dev/todclock.c is a todr(9)-glue only for
evbppc/walnut/dev/ds1743.c.

IMO, we should fix evbppc/walnut/ds1743.c to be suitable for
MI todr(9) functions (sys/dev/clock_subr.c).

And we should move powerpc/ibm4xx/dev/rtc.c to evbppc/evbppc/todclock.c
(or evbppc/evbppc/todr.c).

This approach is the best, I think.

-- 
Kind Regards,
--- shige
Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@{FreeBSD,jp.FreeBSD,NetBSD}.org>