Subject: Re: IBM405GP/GPr OPB bus_space endian (powerpc/ibm4xx/dev/opb.c)
To: None <port-powerpc@NetBSD.org>
From: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@netbsd.org>
List: port-powerpc
Date: 03/13/2006 02:54:26
Shigeyuki Fukushima wrote:
>>> # On-chip GPIO controller
>>> -device gpio { addr, [size = -1] }
>>> -attach gpio at opb
>>> -file arch/powerpc/ibm4xx/dev/gpio_opb.c gpio
>>> +device gpio_opb: gpiobus
>>> +attach gpio_opb at opb
>>> +file arch/powerpc/ibm4xx/dev/gpio_opb.c gpio_opb
>> Underscore in a device name (i.e. "giop_opb0 at opb?" in config files)
>> looks weird a bit to me, and I'm afraid it causes some confusion.
>> Isn't "opbgpio" like epgpio for arm/ep93xx better?
>
> Other devices on IBM4XX have as same.
> We should change IBM4XX device naming rule at the same time.
I'm sorry. This is my misunderstangings.
Is `gpgpio' good like as `gpiic'?
--
Kind Regards,
--- shige
Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@{FreeBSD,jp.FreeBSD,NetBSD}.org>