Subject: Re: about powerpc version of in{,4}_cksum
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@netbsd.org>
From: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
List: port-powerpc
Date: 08/02/2002 18:23:17
At 12:58 PM 8/2/2002, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
>Regards,
>
>On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:44:12PM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
> > At 11:07 AM 7/30/2002, Matt Thomas wrote:
> > >Well, for the G4 case I plan on getting a AltiVec implemention
> > >of in_cksum working shortly.
> >
> > Well, I've written a such a beast and it tends to be 3 times
> > as fast as either the netinet or the powerpc version. The cross
> > over point where AltiVec is faster seems to be about 32 bytes.
> >
> > I have a few more things to clean up but it's looking very
> > promising. I hope to check it in in a few days.
>
>Wouldn't this force us to save the Altivec registers not only on user-user
>context switch, but already at kernel entry?
No. Just like the pmap AltiVec routines, the in_cksum routine will save
and restore any registers it uses so that the lazy AltiVec switching
will continue to work properly.
--
Matt Thomas Internet: matt@3am-software.com
3am Software Foundry WWW URL: http://www.3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA Disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message